ITHENTICATE REPORT SOFTWARE
Google frente a otras herramientas de texto similares en la detección de plagio: un estudio piloto en el Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic ResearchĪntecedentes: Utilizamos el software de detección de plagio en el Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, pero después de que algunos puntos importantes se perdieron, reevaluamos nuestra estrategia y comparamos Google con otros tres programas de texto similares.
ITHENTICATE REPORT MANUAL
Plagiarism Checker X missed minor sections, and Viper missed significant parts and was therefore considered less reliable.Ĭonclusions: Based on the study results, we suggest using two software programmes and manual verification of the manuscript On analysing the case reports, Google and iThenticate were found to be similar. Results: When checking original articles, Google performed the best, iThenticate missed a few minor sections, and Plagiarism Checker X had a lower number of hits, followed by Viper. Each report was checked by the investigators for scoring in addition to the percentage of plagiarism reported in the software. For original research, we considered methodology, results, and discussion and for case reports, we considered case details and discussion. The same manuscripts were run through three text similarity software programmes (iThenticate, Viper, and Plagiarism Checker X). These manuscripts were checked for plagiarism, searching each sentence using Google. Method: 25 manuscripts (16 original articles and 9 case reports) were randomly selected, where the decision to publish had been greatly affected by plagiarism. Click the link below or sign into WINGS and click "iThenticate Request" under the Resources header on the right side of the page.Background: We practised using plagiarism detection software in the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, but after a few significant items were missed, we re-assessed our strategy and compared Google with three other text similarity programmes. You must have a Campus Username (w001abc) and password. To prevent allegations of research misconduct.įor individuals wishing to use iThenticate through Wright State University’s site license, the first step is to obtain a user account.To maintain trust in sponsored program activities that support any research discipline.To ensure compliance with federal, state and institutional requirements relating to the responsible and ethical conduct of research.Once uploaded, the document and the resulting Similarity Report remain in the user’s personal account filing system until the user deletes them. The Office of Research Compliance will not review any documents submitted by users of iThenticate unless requested to do so by the user or the University’s Office of General Counsel. iThenticate is a tool for faculty, staff, and students of Wright State to use in the process of academic research and publishing. Utilization of iThenticate prior to proposal submission and thesis uploading is optional, but is highly encouraged.ĭocuments uploaded in IThenticate remain the proprietary property of the individual who submitted them for analysis and are only available to individuals who have access to the submitter’s personal iThenticate user account. iThenticate is used by Federal government agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF) to check for instances of potential plagiarism in submitted proposals. In addition to comparing the text of an uploaded document to digital text on the open internet, iThenticate also compares uploaded text against text in the published scholarly literature that is otherwise behind publisher firewalls on the internet.
ITHENTICATE REPORT PROFESSIONAL
The service allows account users to easily upload and scan documents, theses, dissertations, manuscripts, research proposals and other professional works into iThenticate which compares the work against 14 billion web pages and 110 million content items from leading academic publications. IThenticate is a plagiarism detection software that is designed to be used by researchers, instructors, graduate students and undergraduates engaged in high-level research to screen written work for originality and copyright infringement. University Policy 6120.03 Administrative Procedures for Allegations of Research Misconduct defines plagiarism as “the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.”